ShareThis Page
States of Terrorism III |

States of Terrorism III

| Thursday, August 24, 2006 12:00 a.m

My reaction to the front page of the Trib on Aug. 21 was that it almost was obscene.

The photo of two young Lebanese boys enjoying fishing at the beach at Tyre (“Fishing for normalcy”) was obviously meant to spin the impression that life had returned to normalcy, especially for children, in Lebanon.

Children throughout the Middle East have been in jeopardy for a long time. Israeli forces have arrested around 4,000 Palestinian children since the beginning of the Al-Aqsa Intifada in September 2000. Israel’s current collective punishment attacks (including sonic booms) against Gaza civilians are causing children to have panic attacks, sleep disturbances, bed-wetting, etc.

At Qana, Lebanon, on July 31, according to the AP, 15 children under age 12 were killed by an Israeli Defense Forces air attack. This precision guided missile was manufactured in the United States, as proven by a fragment upon which was written “For use on MK-84 Guided Bomb BSU-37-B.”

Yes, the IDF have “turned back the clock in Lebanon by 20 years.”

No, the photo of two Lebanese boys enjoying fishing is most assuredly not typical of today’s children in Lebanon nor anywhere else in the Middle East!

Robert L. AckermanNew Alexandria

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.