ShareThis Page
Steel coil drops on parked cars |

Steel coil drops on parked cars

Chuck Biedka
| Tuesday, March 1, 2005 12:00 a.m

WINFIELD TOWNSHIP — State police said a tractor-trailer load shifted along Winfield Road and a heavy roll of steel rolled off and struck vehicles at a car repair shop Sunday night.

No one was injured, but the shop’s spokeswoman wonders what would have happened if the 30,000-pound roll would have hit during the work day.

“The trucks come down here very fast,” said BCP Automotive spokeswoman Penny Rich. “If it would have hit during the day, someone easily could have been killed,” she said. She said her fiance, Bob Peiffer, has owned the shop about eight years.

State police said David S. Walls, 35, of Wampum, was driving the rig westbound on Winfield Road just after 10 p.m.

Police said the rig entered a curve, just past the elementary school, at a “speed greater than reasonable,” which caused a large coil of steel to roll off and hit five vehicles in the parking lot of BCP Automotive.

“We were at the movies when we got calls,” Rich said.

Firefighters tried to keep diesel fuel from entering an unnamed tributary that flows into Little Buffalo Creek,

Police said Walls was wearing a seat belt.

Police didn’t give a damage estimate or say if charges have been filed. A corporal said the matter is under investigation.

Rich said the truck was operated for a local trucking company and she said the company cleaned up most of the mess Monday.

She said insurance adjusters were working at the shop Monday afternoon to gauge the damage.

Rich wasn’t told where the steel was being shipped or where the load originated.

Rich and Peiffer owned some of the cars belonged to customers, she said.

State environmental officials couldn’t be immediately reached.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, or via Twitter .

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.