ShareThis Page
Steelers add defensive tackle Roye |

Steelers add defensive tackle Roye

The Steelers signed veteran defensive lineman Orpheus Roye to a one-year contract Sunday, and he suited up for the team’s final practice of training camp. Taken by the Steelers in the sixth round of the 1996 draft, Roye spent four seasons in Pittsburgh before leaving for Cleveland.

&#149 Linebackers Keyaron Fox (back) and Mike Humpal (stinger) did not practice Sunday. Tight end Cody Boyd (shoulder), defensive tackle Scott Paxson (stinger) and free safety Ryan Mundy (ankle) also missed the Steelers’ final practice at St. Vincent. Mundy, a Woodland Hills High graduate, did some light running yesterday. Fullback Carey Davis couldn’t finish practice because of stomach flu, coach Mike Tomlin said.

&#149 Cornerback Deshea Townsend played safety for the second consecutive day, but Tomlin said the Steelers just wanted to get the veteran some work at the position.

&#149 Veteran punters Mitch Berger and Paul Ernster are competing to replace Daniel Sepulveda, who was lost for the season with a torn ACL in his right knee. The significance of that for Jeff Reed is whoever wins the punting job will also hold for his field goal and extra point attempts. Reed is working with Berger and Ernster, but he said he probably won’t get enough repetitions with either one of them to feel comfortable with whoever is tabbed to punt for the Steelers this season.


9 — Orpheus Roye’s sack total with the Steelers from 1996-99.

9.5 — Sacks registered by Roye with Cleveland (2000-07).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.