Steelers’ Harrison fined $20,000 by NFL |

Steelers’ Harrison fined $20,000 by NFL

Two days after meeting with NFL commissioner Roger Goodell about helmet-to-helmet hits, Steelers outside linebacker James Harrison on Thursday was fined $20,000 for a roughing-the-passer penalty.

Harrison has been fined three times this season for a total of $100,000.

“The amount of money is becoming an issue,” he said. “Two of the fines they issued to me weren’t even called penalties, so I don’t know what to say.”

The three-time Pro Bowler said he expected a fine for the penalty he drew for hitting Saints quarterback Drew Brees in the Steelers’ 20-10 loss Sunday. He didn’t exactly buy the NFL’s reasoning, though.

“They were saying because I put my face mask into his back,” Harrison said. “I don’t really think I put my facemask in his back. I thought it was off to the left, but they had a different view of it.”

Harrison met with Goodell on Tuesday at league headquarters in New York. Their talk came two weeks after he was fined $75,000 for what the NFL classified a dangerous helmet-to-helmet hit on Browns receiver Mohamed Massaquoi.

“They wanted to see me,” Harrison said. “It’s not like I could say, ‘Hey, I’m not coming.’ ”

By the numbers

28 : The Steelers’ NFL rank in touchdowns when inside the opponent’s 20-yard line

36.8 : The Steelers’ touchdown percentage when inside the opponent’s 20-yard line


“Probably ahead. When he came back against Cleveland and played as well as he did and the week after, I think it was way ahead of schedule. There are certain phases of the game — all of the hurry-up stuff and the red zone — that takes a little more time, because the field shrinks in the red zone and it’s hard to simulate it out here in practice to get the speed of it.”

Bruce Arians, Steelers offensive coordinator, on whether quarterback Ben Roethlisberger is where he thought he would be three games into his season

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.