Steelers speak out in favor of Clarett |

Steelers speak out in favor of Clarett

Jerry DiPaola

Steelers running back Jerome Bettis believes he was ready for the NFL as a 250-pound sophomore at Notre Dame in 1991.

“Physically, I was ready,” he said.

But Bettis believes a bigger issue with running back Maurice Clarett, who is suing the NFL for entry into the 2004 draft after only one season at Ohio State, is his mental and emotional readiness.

“Physically, he has all the tools and he’s ready to play,” Bettis said. “What teams and coaches may be concerned about is his mental capacity in terms of grasping the blitzes and things of that nature.

“Personally, I think he’ll be fine. I think he should be allowed to play.”

Bettis, who spent only three years at Notre Dame, rushed for 1,429 yards as a 21-year-old rookie with the Los Angeles Rams in 1993.

“If this kid wants to play, he deserves the opportunity to play,” Bettis said. “It’s unfortunate that it’s come to this. I think the NCAA and Ohio State have taken this and made a little too much of it.”

Still, Bettis said going to the NFL early involves more than just playing football. “You have to live,” he said. “It’s not just you in a dorm room. You have a home. You have a place where you live. You pay your bills. You do all the normal things that the normal adult does that you didn’t have to do (in college). That changes everything. You have to be strong mentally at that young age to be able to handle it.”

Tennessee Titans quarterback Steve McNair, who was not a regular starter until his third NFL season, agrees with Bettis. “You can have the best athletic ability, but before you can really be dominant in the NFL, you have to be ready mentally.”

Steelers defensive end Kimo von Oelhoffen said the fact that Clarett, 19, has been suspended by Ohio State should stamp his ticket to the NFL.

“If the guy’s not in school and he has no chance to be in school and he’s able to compete in the NFL at this point, I don’t see why they don’t let him play.

“Try to go back to school, but if you try and you can’t, let him play.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.