Steelers spotlight |

Steelers spotlight

Jerry DiPaola

OUCH!: The Steelers’ first possession of the game lasted 9 minutes, 17 seconds and cost the Titans three injuries. Linebacker Peter Sirmon hurt his back and left the field on a cart after a crunching block from fullback Dan Kreider. Defensive ends James Atkins and Carlos Hall were also staggered by hard hits, but returned for the next series. Sirmon didn’t return, but his replacement Rocky Boiman returned an interception 60 yards for a touchdown in the fourth quarter.

CLEVER GUY: Offensive coordinator Mike Mularkey gained 20 of 64 yards on a first-half touchdown drive — almost one-third of the total — with consecutive trick plays. First, Amos Zereoue took a direct snap from center while quarterback Tommy Maddox was walking down the line of scrimmage, apparently barking instructions. Zereoue slipped and fell after a 5-yard run. Then, wide receiver Antwaan Randle El lined up as the quarterback in shotgun formation and ran 15 yards for a first down.

SHUT YOUR MOUTH: Steelers right tackle Todd Fordham, normally a mild-mannered guy, hollered at head linesman Tony Veteri, insisting that Titans defensive end Jevon Kearse was offsides in the second quarter. Veteri didn’t pay any attention to Fordham, but Kearse did. He hollered at Fordham.

NO FLOW: Steelers coach Bill Cowher made an exceptional effort to keep starting running back Amos Zereoue in the flow of the game, but he gained only 51 yards on 18 carries — zero yards on eight carries in the second half.

BY THE NUMBERS: The Titans lost the battle of possession in the first quarter, 13:03-1:57, and the first half, 21:13-8:47. … With nine receptions for the third time this season, Hines Ward moved past Louis Lipps and into second place on the Steelers’ all-time reception list with 361. Next up: Hall of Famer John Stallworth with 537. … The crowd of 63,244 was the fourth-largest at Heinz Field (second in the regular season).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.