ShareThis Page
Steelers want to earn ring for Bettis before he retires |

Steelers want to earn ring for Bettis before he retires

| Wednesday, December 28, 2005 12:00 a.m

One of the Steelers’ unofficial goals this season has been to get running back Jerome Bettis into the Super Bowl in his hometown of Detroit and get him a ring before he retires.

From Bettis’ perspective, he should have already won a title.

“No question,” Bettis said. “I felt, a couple of those years, we had the best team, that was the sad part. All three years, I felt we had the better team (better than the three eventual Super Bowl winners).”

The Steelers have been to three AFC Championship Games since acquiring Bettis in April 1996 from St. Louis for a second-round pick in 1996 and a fourth-round pick in 1997.

  • They lost to Denver, 24-21, on Jan. 11, 1998, at Three Rivers Stadium (the Broncos went on to beat the Packers, 31-24, in Super Bowl XXXII).

  • They lost to New England, 24-17, on Jan. 27, 2002, at Heinz Field (the Patriots went on to beat the Rams, 20-17, in Super Bowl XXXVI).

  • They lost to New England, 41-27, on Jan. 23, 2005, at Heinz Field (the Patriots went on to beat the Eagles, 24-21, in Super Bowl XXXIX).

    “That’s something you gotta live with,” Bettis said. “It is what it is.”

    Categories: News
  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.