ShareThis Page
Steelhead lacking in Lake Erie’s streams |

Steelhead lacking in Lake Erie’s streams

The Tribune-Review
| Friday, January 5, 2007 12:00 a.m

There haven’t been any sizable runs of fresh steelhead moving into Lake Erie’s tributary streams lately, and what fish have shown up have been on the small side, according to reports from the region.

The Fish and Boat Commission released several hundred spawned-out breeder fish into the McKean hole off I-79 and the Gloski hole. The McKean hole, in particular, is deep, so anglers fishing the bottom generally have the best success, said deputy conservation officer Randy leighton.

Elsewhere along the streams, fishermen using small, natural presentations are having the best luck, said Gary Heubel of Poor Richard’s Bait Shop.

The warm weather and little rain has left the creeks low and clear, so small orange sucker spawn patterns, bead head hare’s ears, blue and black stonefly nymphs, black, brown and olive wooly buggers and marabou micro jigs fished alone or tipped with a maggot have all been producing. Small natural baits like a single waxworm, single cured eggs, live and dead shiners and one or two grubs on a 16 to 18 egg hook can work well when dead drifted with the current, Leighton said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.