ShareThis Page
Stewart’s Take: Press conference |

Stewart’s Take: Press conference

| Wednesday, October 1, 2008 12:00 a.m

West Virginia head coach Bill Stewart addressed reporters at his weekly press conference on Tuesday afternoon.

On using both Pat White and backup quarterback Jarrett Brown :

“If I were the defensive coach at Rutgers, I would think that, wow, No. 16 (Brown) and No. 5 (White) back there, what else are they doing• It gives them something to work on. We ran a reverse, we ran a counter, we threw the ball to Jarrett (Brown), and he threw the ball. There are a few more things that we can do and that we will do.”

On spreading around the ball :

“What I’m still trying to do, and what I’m telling the offensive coaches, is that No. 5 (White) and No. 7 (Devine) need help. That’s why we’re trying to get the ball out to No. 21 (Dorrell Johnson), hit No. 9 (Jock Sanders), the wide receivers, and that’s why No. 16 (Brown) came in the game. Somebody needs to give us another dimension. You cannot win consistently in this league with two players. It doesn’t work that way.”

On Noel Devine’s improvised runs :

“I asked him if he ever saw the surfers on TV and I told him stay in the wave. When the tidal wave comes off the line of scrimmage and we have a guy as a tight end and in motion, we come off that wave and try to knock those guys off. It’s just like a wave and he sees a crack and he jumps at it. That works sometimes, but we want him to stay in the wave and have patience. Patience to the hole, speed through the hole.”

On the upsets :

“Football is getting better; just look at our league. It’s not just in the Big East, it’s everywhere. People know how to knock people off. Coaches are better, players are better and they know how to play football. The number of scholarships is better. It’s a different game. The game is balancing out.”

is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.