Stop searching her mom |

Stop searching her mom

Ann Coulter’s column ” Stop searching old ladies ” (Nov. 19 and hit a nerve with me after I took my own 89-year-old mother to the airport.

A skycap took her to security in a wheelchair, as she can neither walk far nor stand long. Neither my mother nor I had traveled while having to deal with the need for a wheelchair.

We put our shoes and sweaters in bins, which we expected. Mom was then wheeled into a clear, free-standing “room,” which we later learned was a prelude to a search. I was informed there were additional steps.

The security woman had my mother stand without her shoes, which makes it more difficult for her, and then asked her to move away from the wheelchair and extend her arms with feet apart. She then began searching her.

My mother was trembling with the effort of standing still. I said, “Can’t she have her cane?”

There was no offer to search her in private.

If security personnel knew she could stand for a short time, why not let her walk through the scanner rather than subject her to standing for a long time and be subjected to the humiliation of a search in front of people?

I was afraid to say anything for fear they would somehow make things more difficult for her.

It seems the enemy has succeeded. In our state of terror, we have let go of common sense and common courtesy.

A frail 89-year-old woman has become a threat. Our security measures grow increasingly invasive of our physical and personal privacy. The new body scan may even be a threat to our health, according to Coulter.

Certainly we need to take measures to secure our physical safety. However, we cannot allow ourselves to become terrorized into unreasonable methods. Then, those who would harm us have done their job.

Joanne DeLuca

Pleasant Hills

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.