ShareThis Page
Strange trip |

Strange trip

| Wednesday, November 29, 2006 12:00 a.m

Allison Garda’s victories this season never were easy. During a meet with rival Greensburg Central Catholic, a bee stung her tongue just a half mile into the meet and she finished the match with a swollen mouth. The Riverview junior finished second in the Freedom Invitational while running the last two miles with only one shoe and suffered an asthma attack during another.

However, none of these setbacks deterred her, and Garda finished fifth in the WPIAL and 29th in the state. Her Lady Raiders team won the WPIAL as a team and finished eighth in the state.

For her accomplishments, Garda is the Valley News Dispatch Girls Cross Country Runner of the Year.

“All those weird things that kept happening to me, they made me try harder and harder,” Garda said. “I persevered through the whole thing and by the time I went to WPIALs, I had a great race.”

Garda engaged in a lengthy training regimen over the summer, running more than 500 miles. She also attended the Princeton cross country camp and worked in a strength training program.

“I had really good guidance from my coaches,” Garda said. “I love training and I love competing and going out on long runs.”

Garda finished third in the Gateway Invitational, which featured a field of mostly Class AAA schools. She also finished second in the Lakeview Invitational and fourth in the Oatlands Invitational. The Oatlands Invitational featured runners from five states, but that still isn’t Garda’s happiest memory of the season.

“Our school finished high in the state meet, and I accomplished my goal of being in the top 30 in the state,” Garda said “Every time we had new successes with this young team, it was a thrilling experience to do it again.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.