Strike threat grows at Peters Township School District |

Strike threat grows at Peters Township School District

Teachers union officials said a strike seems more likely since they failed to reach an agreement with the Peters Township School District during a three-hour meeting Sunday.

The teachers’ contract expired in August, and unless an agreement is reached soon, more than 200 teachers, counselors, librarians and nurses in the Washington County district could walk out Oct. 28.

District and union officials are scheduled to meet again Monday, Sunday and Oct. 27.

In a statement, Kris Bergman, president of the Peters Township Federation of Teachers, called the district’s proposals Sunday “insulting.”

Bergman said the district “reneged on earlier agreements we reached over the summer.”

The district proposed that teachers pay more toward health care, in addition to working longer hours and more days, according to the federation.

Peters Township teachers’ salaries for the 2014-15 school year ranged from $45,900 for a first-year teacher to $104,000 for a teacher with a master’s degree.

Shelly Belcher, communications coordinator for the school district, said the federation came to the table with the same offer it made before.

The additional health care contributions would be offset by salary increases, Belcher said, and only teachers with family coverage and in the highest pay grade would feel the difference. But Bergman argued that the salary raises wouldn’t be enough.

Elizabeth Behrman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7886 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.