ShareThis Page
Strip mine appeal denied |

Strip mine appeal denied

| Thursday, September 6, 2001 12:00 a.m

ROSTRAVER TOWNSHIP – A Westmoreland County judge has blocked a mining company’s request to strip coal near a residential area on the border of Rostraver Township and Monessen.

Common Pleas Judge Daniel J. Ackerman denied Elizabeth-based Gary Gioia Coal Co.’s appeal.

In an order, Ackerman state the coal company lacked the necessary state Department of Environmental Protection permits when it made the request to the Rostraver Township Zoning Hearing Board.

The Zoning Hearing Board addressed the issue on Feb. 14 and March 14, and then denied the request because the project purportedly failed to meet the requirements for a special exception.

The proposed mining site is located off of Tyrol Boulevard near the Snyder’s warehouse. ADC Inc. of Mt. Pleasant owns the land, which is in close proximity to nearly 200 in Rostraver and Monessen.

Fifteen families, represented by Monessen attorney Mark Shire, joined the court proceeding.

The City of Monessen supported the opposition effort.

Shire said the families are concerned that the mining would feature an excavation as deep as 65-feet and would take up to a year and a half to complete.

Shire said the families also are worried about coal trucks operating on Tyrol Boulevard and the possibility of mine subsidence.

Gioia’s attorney, Robert Garvin of Pittsburgh, said his client had yet to review the decision and declined comment on a possible appeal.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.