ShareThis Page
Student: Contact was consensual |

Student: Contact was consensual

An East Allegheny High School student testified Thursday that she and Jarold A. “Jerry” Winkleblech, the district’s band director, had frequent contact — kissing and hugging — while at school, and that the contact was consensual.

After the nearly hourlong hearing, Winkleblech, 33, of Versailles, was held for trial on charges of indecent assault, child endangerment, corruption of a minor, unlawful contact with a minor, criminal trespass and criminal use of a communication device.

Yesterday’s hearing was before North Versailles District Judge Robert Barner. Winkleblech’s formal arraignment is Aug. 23.

The student, who is 16 years old and has just completed her sophomore year, testified that she met Winkleblech, whom she called “Wink,” when she was in eighth grade. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review does not publish the names of victims of alleged indecent assault.

She said in February 2005, when she was in ninth grade, she began text messaging Winkleblech’s cell phone, and he responded. At the beginning, the messages consisted of “Hi” and “How are you?” the girl testified.

She said that by April 2005 she messaged Winkleblech, a music teacher, that she loved him, and he responded in kind.

She testified that she got passes out of classes such as geometry to go the to band room to meet Winkleblech. In December 2005, the contact became physical with hugging, kissing and “caressing each other’s backs,” she said.

Winkleblech earlier this year gave the girl gifts, including his wedding band, high school ring, a gold chain, a heart pendant, a stuffed animal and a glass angel, she testified.

Under cross-examination by Joseph Yablonski, Winkleblech’s lawyer, the girl said she and the band director did not have sexual relations. She testified that her contact with Winkleblech was consensual.

Superintendent Roger D’Emidio testified that when he confronted Winkleblech last month with e-mail and text messages between the band director and the girl, as well as excerpts from the girl’s diary, Winkleblech said he “got into something he lost control of.”

Winkleblech, who remains suspended with pay, had no comment after the hearing. Winkleblech’s base pay in the 2004-05 school year was $39,286, according to state Department of Education records.

Yablonski said Winkleblech made “errors in judgment” and was in a “compromised emotional and psychological state” during his relationship with the student.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.