ShareThis Page
Students have choice in closing of for-profit colleges: Keep credits, or loans will be forgiven |

Students have choice in closing of for-profit colleges: Keep credits, or loans will be forgiven

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — A top education official said Wednesday that the 16,000 former Corinthian Colleges students whose campuses abruptly closed this week will automatically have their federal student loans discharged — but only if they agree to forgo any credits they earned at the schools.

Ted Mitchell, Education Department undersecretary, said the department is bound by statute and regulation on how it handles a case of a student’s school closing.

“You can have the credits you paid for, or you can relinquish the credits if you want the money back. …. Students can have one or the other, but not both,” Mitchell said.

Corinthian, a large chain of for-profit colleges that nearly collapsed last summer amid fraud allegations, shuttered its 28 remaining ground campuses this week, about two weeks after the Education Department announced it was fining it $30 million for misrepresentation.

The closures left students at campuses in California and a few other states struggling to decide whether to have the credits they’ve earned transferred to another school or to try to get their federal loans forgiven. Some other for-profit schools have sought to recruit these students, and Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., has criticized the department for making a list of schools available that included some for-profit schools that are the subject of investigations.

If the thousands of students file a claim related to the closures, the cost to taxpayers would be about $215 million, Mitchell said.

Ultimately, though, the potential cost to taxpayers related to the collapse of Corinthian could reach the billions. Many former students have filed “defense to repayment” claims with the department, using a previously little-known part of the law that allows loan forgiveness to students if they are the victims of fraud.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.