Sunday pops |

Sunday pops

The party of civil rights is not the Democrats, correctly reminds Bruce Bartlett, author of “Wrong on Race: The Democratic Party’s Buried Past.” Liberals will call this “revisionist history”; thinking people will call it correcting the liberal fiction. … City Journal’s Michael Knox Beran says John McCain would do his campaign a huge favor by talking about Ronald Reagan instead of Teddy Roosevelt. After all, Mr. Roosevelt was “a man of the state,” not a conservative. As Mr. Beran reminds, TR “made up for his want of inspirational principle by striking out in all sorts of irrelevant directions.” McCain would be wise to heed the lesson. … The Pennsylvania chapter of the Sierra Club includes in its latest Sylvanian magazine the science-bereft American Lung Association contention that Pittsburgh’s air pollution is the worst in the nation. And for perverted measure, it also throws in a headline that says “Return of the smoky city.” It’s just this kind of intellectual vapidity that gives the Sierra Club the bad name it deserves. … When Arkansas state Rep. Lindsley Smith proposed a day to honor Revolutionary pamphleteer Thomas Paine, she could not even garner even a simple majority. Quips The Economist magazine, “34 legislators did not vote at all — probably because they had no idea who Paine was.” Indeed, a sad sign of American times.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.