ShareThis Page
Sunday pops |

Sunday pops

| Sunday, June 26, 2005 12:00 a.m

The Miami Herald editorializes for keeping public television “free of politics.” We’re all for that. But what the Herald wants — in the guise of “editorial integrity” and “independence” — is the preservation of a taxpayer-funded electronic playground for liberals. Those days must end. … The Chicago Sun-Times reports that Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., apologized for his Gitmo/gulag remarks only after Chicago Mayor Richard Daley called the comments of his good friend “a disgrace.” Post-apology, Mr. Daley released a statement supportive of Mr. Durbin saying that “public statements can sometimes be misinterpreted.” Sometimes. But not this time. … The other side to the exacerbating problem of illegal aliens is that U.S. businesses are all too willing to employ them. But the Government Accountability Office says authorities aren’t doing much about it. Only three employers were threatened with sanctions for hiring illegals last year. The number was 162 in 2003 and 417 in 1999. This, of course, is an open invitation to would-be terrorists. … Jefferson Elementary School in Berkeley, Calif., dropped Thomas Jefferson’s name because he owned hundreds of slaves. The new name is Sequoia Elementary. Critics note that the Cherokee nation, led by Chief Sequoia, owned thousands of slaves. The district says the school is named after the tree . Pardon us, but the tree is named for the chief. Nice try, though.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.