ShareThis Page
Supervisors become involved in Route 31 special committee |

Supervisors become involved in Route 31 special committee

| Tuesday, July 10, 2001 12:00 a.m

DONEGAL – The Donegal Township Supervisors have made the decision to become involved in the Route 31 Special Committee that has been formed by the Mountain Laurel Chamber of Commerce.

According to the chamber’s newsletter, the new committee will gather information on what is needed to improve Route 31 and research the impact the improvements will have on local businesses.

‘We’re trying to get everybody together from the municipalities, the residents and the business community so that we can come up with the best ideas to present to PennDOT,’ said chamber president, Tom Guiher.

Many business owners feel that the congestion on Route 31 discourages travelers from stopping at area businesses and utilizing their services.

‘At certain times the congestion on (Route) 31 makes it difficult to get on and off Route 711 and the turnpike,’ said Guiher. ‘With a little bit of improvement to the road, we could make that a lot easier and safer for travelers.’

Right now the committee is in the process of collecting ideas and has not come up with a consensus as to what exactly their ideas are, said Guiher.

One idea that has been talked about though is the addition of a third lane on Route 31 westbound at the Pennsylvania Turnpike’s Donegal Interchange.

‘There have been a number of times when someone coming off the turnpike has pulled out in front of me thinking that I was going to turn onto the turnpike,’ said Guiher. ‘As a veteran traveler of this road, I’m cautious and watch for that.’

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.