Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg has stent placed in heart artery |

Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg has stent placed in heart artery

The Los Angeles Times

WASHINGTON — Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who vowed this year to stay on the Supreme Court as long as she could go “full steam,” announced Wednesday that she had undergone a “coronary catheterization procedure” to place a stent in her right coronary artery.

Ginsburg, 81, was said to be resting comfortably in MedStar Washington Hospital Center and was expected to be discharged within 48 hours.

A statement issued by the court said a “coronary blockage was discovered after Ginsburg experienced discomfort during routine exercise last night.”

Ginsburg is the senior liberal on the closely divided court, and her health and longevity have become a topic of concern on the political left as President Obama heads into the final two years of his term.

Ginsburg was treated for colon cancer in 1999 and pancreatic cancer in 2009, but she bounced back from both and did not miss any time when the high court was in session.

A stent is a small mesh tube that can be inserted into an artery through the groin or through the wrist. It is then inflated at the spot of a blockage.

“It restores the blood flow and prevents injury to the heart muscle,” said Dr. Daniel Edmundowicz, chief of cardiology at Temple University Hospital in Philadelphia. “But it would also mean she now has an increased risk for a heart attack down the road.”

Medical experts say stents are an effective and noninvasive means of treating a blockage.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.