ShareThis Page
Surprise teams play for women’s title |

Surprise teams play for women’s title

| Tuesday, April 5, 2011 12:00 a.m

This looks like a case of the irresistible force meeting the immovable object.

A Notre Dame team whose offense is so good and varied that a Hall of Fame coach who played them four times this season calls the Irish all but unstoppable.

“They’re an impossible team to play defense against,” UConn’s Geno Auriemma said.

A Texas A&M team whose defense is so effectively disruptive from end to end that an All-America player figures it does double duty as the Aggies’ offense.

That is the matchup for tonight’s NCAA women’s championship game in Indianapolis now that No. 10 Notre Dame and No. 8 Texas A&M each used its strength to oust the top two teams in the final regular season poll, Connecticut and Stanford, in Sunday’s semifinals.

“They get a lot of steals. They get a lot of turnovers. And they produce by turning the ball over,” said Stanford star Nneka Ogwumike, who scored half her team’s points in the 63-62 loss to the Aggies.

Using an in-your-face, high-intensity defense, Texas A&M forced 22 Stanford turnovers and scored 21 points off them. The Aggies (32-5), in their first Final Four, allowed Stanford just two baskets in the final six minutes as they wiped out a 10-point deficit.

“They really get up and guard people,” Notre Dame coach Muffet McGraw said. “I thought their pressure is why they won the game (Sunday) night.”

McGraw, whose team is seeking a second national title a decade after its first, expects the final to turn into a defensive battle.

That might favor A&M.

“A lot of people — I don’t want to say they fear our defense, but I think they really respect what we do on the defensive end,” said Texas A&M point guard Sydney Colson, who had four steals against Stanford.

“We take so much pride on making people feel uncomfortable and making them do things they don’t want to do. So I definitely think that worries them a bit.”

The Irish do have an advantage in that their biggest offensive threat is the player who has the ball most, sophomore point guard Skylar Diggins of South Bend, Ill.

Diggins, the team’s No. 2 scorer overall, had a career-defining performance, as the Irish (31-7) ended a 12-game losing streak against UConn, 72-63.

She wriggled through the lane for layups or passes that gave teammates easy baskets. She stepped back to hit a couple three-pointers and stepped up for soft jumpers. The result: 28 points on 10-of-14 floor shooting and 6-of-6 foul shooting, plus six assists and two steals.

“They don’t make a lot of mistakes,” Aggies’ coach Gary Blair said of the Irish. “You’re looking at a team shooting 48 percent. They are shooting as well in the playoffs as they did in the regular season.”

They have met only once before, with Texas A&M winning at a 1995 tournament in Hawaii. They weren’t supposed to meet in the final, expected to be reprise of last year’s UConn-Stanford title game, which would feature two of the sport’s traditional powers.

“I know we screwed it up for ESPN,” Blair said.

Additional Information:

National title game

Texas A&M vs. Notre Dame

8:30 p.m. today, Conseco Fieldhouse, Indianapolis

Records: Texas A&M (32-5); Notre Dame (31-7)


Line: Notre Dame by 2 1/2

Series: Texas A&M leads, 1-0

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.