ShareThis Page
Suspect identified in Wilkinsburg shootings |

Suspect identified in Wilkinsburg shootings

Margaret Harding
| Thursday, April 7, 2016 11:54 a.m
Robert Thomas

Four weeks after a backyard massacre in Wilkinsburg in which six people were killed, police have a suspect: a Pittsburgh man arrested on unrelated drug and weapons charges.

At a bail review hearing before Common Pleas Judge David Cashman, prosecutors and Allegheny County homicide detectives said police consider Robert Thomas, 27, of Pittsburgh a suspect in the March 9 shooting on Franklin Avenue. They asked that he be held without bail.

“Following our argument that we consider Thomas a flight risk and a danger to the community based on his previous record, and the drug and weapons charges that he currently faces, Judge Cashman agreed with our assessment and denied bond,” said District Attorney’s Office spokesman Mike Manko.

Defense attorney Casey White said he was disappointed by the accusations against Thomas and that his client, whom he has known for a number of years, maintains his innocence.

Allegheny County police arrested Thomas on Tuesday with Justin Gomez, 27, of Rankin, Ashley Smith, 30, of Pittsburgh and Cheron Shelton, 29, of Homewood.All were questioned about the Wilkinsburg shooting.

The four were arrested on charges stemming from a 2013 search of Smith’s apartment on Hill Avenue in Wilkinsburg, where police said they found guns that had been reported stolen, drugs and ammunition.

Wilkinsburg police filed charges for drugs and receiving stolen property shortly after the search, but prosecutors were not ready to present the case after a delay, and Magisterial District Judge Kim Hoots dismissed the charges. The same charges were refiled in April 2013, but the prosecution again could not proceed and the case was dropped that July.

Gomez and Thomas were charged the first time; police added Shelton the second time. Smith was not charged until this week.

Shelton, whom police questioned March 25 when he was arrested for violating his probation, was questioned at least a second time Wednesday in Allegheny County Police headquarters.

Police said they found his fingerprint on a gun like one used in the Wilkinsburg killings.

They have not named Gomez, Smith or Shelton as suspects.

Gomez was released Thursday after posting $100,000 bail. Smith was released Wednesday on $40,000 bail.

A preliminary hearing for all four is scheduled for April 14 before Hoots.

Those killed at the backyard barbecue were siblings Jerry Shelton, 35, Brittany Powell, 27, and Chanetta Powell, 25; their cousin, Tina Shelton, 37; and a family friend, Shada Mahone, 26. Chanetta Powell’s unborn child, Demetrius, also died. Two people were critically wounded, including LaMont Powell.

LaMont Powell’s attorney, Frank Walker, said his client had no reaction to the naming of a suspect in his family’s killing.

“He’s taking care of his health. He has tubes coming out of him, he still has bullets lodged in him — he’s still in shock,” he said.

Walker said neither Cheron Shelton nor Thomas were familiar to Powell.

Authorities said Cheron Shelton is not related to the victims, who were ambushed during a cookout at Brittany Powell’s home.

Walker and his client were in Pittsburgh Municipal Court on Thursday for a preliminary hearing on charges that Powell assaulted his sister Chanetta’s boyfriend in December. That hearing was postponed until May because a prosecution witness was unavailable.

Three days after the shootings, police searched a home on Nolan Court in Homewood and discovered a firearm and a cache of ammunition, as well as identification belonging to Shelton. Lab tests turned up a fingerprint belonging to Shelton on a semi-automatic rifle, which was reported stolen last year in Uniontown.

Megan Guza contributed. Matthew Santoni is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.