ShareThis Page
Suspect in murder arrested out of state |

Suspect in murder arrested out of state

| Sunday, October 7, 2001 12:00 a.m

A Castle Shannon man wanted in the stabbing death of an Upper St. Clair man in August is believed to have been arrested out of state.

Upper St. Clair police said they received information Friday that Jonathan David Bouldin, 35, was in police custody and were attempting to confirm the information.

They did not specify who supplied the information, where Bouldin is being held or the circumstances of the arrest. A news conference is scheduled for 10 a.m. Monday at the Upper St. Clair Police Department.

Bouldin has been at large since Aug. 8, when police believe he killed Tony Keele, 35, of Upper St. Clair in a house Keele shared with Patricia Keele, his mother, and Robyn Stubenraugh, 22, his girlfriend.

Stubenraugh had lived with Bouldin for a couple of months until Aug. 3, when she moved her personal belongings from Bouldin’s apartment to Keele’s house, police said.

Police said Bouldin entered the home and accosted Stubenraugh, and Keele intervened. Bouldin stabbed Keele in the chest, back and arms, then fled, police said.

Bouldin’s father lives in Tennessee, his stepmother lives in South Dakota, and his ex-wife and daughter live in Connecticut, according to police. At the time of the attack, Bouldin was on parole for having slashed two people with a box cutter during a bar fight in Meadville, Crawford County, in 1998.

is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.