Suspect to appear at hearing |

Suspect to appear at hearing

Tawnya Panizzi

SHARPSBURG: The man who is accused of pulling a gun on Patrolman Steve Kober, who then shot the suspect, is expected to appear for a preliminary hearing Thursday.

Michael Nicholson, 27, of Pittsburgh, will face charges before District Justice Elissa Lang that include receiving stolen property, illegal possession or use of a firearm, illegal carrying of a firearm and two counts each of aggravated assault and reckless endangerment. The shooting incident occurred Sept. 1.

His hearing is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m.

Nicholson’s hearing was first scheduled Sept. 11 but was then delayed because he still was recuperating in the hospital, according to his attorney, Public Defender Cynthia Cook. Assistant District Attorney Michael Sullivan could not be reached for comment.

Nicholson, who also was later accused of running a heroin ring from a Ross Township motel, was in Allegheny General Hospital while recovering from a gunshot wound to his lower back. He was accused of pulling a handgun on Kober and Etna police Officer Gary Cutenese, who attempted to question Nicholson near the 100 block of South Main Street after coming upon a suspected drug deal.

According to court documents, Kober, a four-year veteran of the police department, noticed Nicholson about 3:10 a.m. in the area that police believe is a heavy-traffic location for drug deals. Kober attempted to question Nicholson, who resisted a weapons search. Sharpsburg police said Nicholson pulled a gun from his waistband but that it jammed. Kober ordered him to drop the weapon, but Nicholson refused. That’s when Kober opened fire in self-defense, Police Chief Mike Rapino said previously.

Rapino did not return calls left at his office seeking comment this week.

Kober was offered paid administrative leave while the Allegheny County Police investigate the shooting. At his request, he is assigned to desk duty.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.