ShareThis Page
Swiss vote on minarets likely to be unique |

Swiss vote on minarets likely to be unique

| Tuesday, December 1, 2009 12:00 a.m

PARIS — Switzerland’s vote to ban minarets is the blunt expression of wider worries about Islam in Europe, but the typically Swiss option of holding a national debate and referendum on them is doubtful to be repeated elsewhere.

Minarets already grace hundreds of mosques built across the continent in recent decades as immigration swelled the Muslim population — now estimated at around 15 million to 18 million — to the point that Islam has become the second faith in some countries.

Thousands more have no minaret or only a small symbolic one, either because these mosques were set up in existing buildings or because local authorities limited the towers’ height.

The minaret’s power to polarize derives from its perceived role as a statement of Muslim domination. Very few in Europe are used to issue the call to prayer common in Islamic countries.

Far-right minority parties use minarets to fan popular fears, but many European officials have come to accept them as long as they fit into the local surroundings.

In France, whose 5 million Muslim minority is Europe’s largest, the heated debates over mosques in recent decades have mostly given way to pragmatic deals about minarets’ height. Large central mosques are under construction in several cities. “The idea of a referendum to ban minarets in France is unthinkable,” said Said Branine, editor in chief of the Muslim news website in Paris. “But the extreme right wing will try to exploit the Swiss vote politically.”

“The specifically Swiss aspect lies in the voting system, which calls on voters to decide issues that are not presented in this way elsewhere,” Swiss Islam specialist Patrick Haenni told the French daily Le Monde.

Italian sociologist Stefano Allievi said in a recent report that conflicts over Islam could grow as Europe becomes more diverse but the longer-term trend was towards more integration.

This is happening in France, where a parliamentary panel is studying a proposed ban on full facial veils, known as burqas and niqabs, but its chairman admitted two weeks ago that it would not recommend outlawing them.

At the same time, the far-right National Front’s deputy leader, Marine Le Pen, has seized on the Swiss vote to say Europeans “reject the ostentatious and often provocative signs of politico-religious Muslim groups.”

Branine said the National Front would stress this in its campaign for regional polls in March to win back conservative voters who backed Nicolas Sarkozy’s tough law-and-order line in his presidential election campaign two years ago.

Allievi noted in his report that mosque building has become fairly routine in France. Marseille recently gave the green light for a large “cathedral mosque,” and builders put the cupola onto Strasbourg’s new grand mosque last week.

Britain’s emphasis on multiculturalism and religious rights “have contributed to creating a climate conducive to the presence and visibility of Islam,” he wrote.

Germany has more mosques than any other European country, but Bosnia and has been relatively open to minarets, Allievi said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.