ShareThis Page
Symphony strike settled, concerts resume Dec. 2 |

Symphony strike settled, concerts resume Dec. 2

Mark Kanny
| Wednesday, November 23, 2016 2:57 p.m
Steven Adams | Tribune-Review
Members of the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra went on strike on Friday, Sept. 30, 2016.

The Pittsburgh Symphony and its striking musicians have reached agreement on a new five-year contract, which runs through Sept. 5, 2021, the symphony announced Wednesday.

Concerts will resume Dec. 2 and 4 with music director Manfred Honeck leading free concerts at Heinz Hall, Downtown.

The agreement calls for a 10.5 percent pay cut of the $107,239 base salary in the first year, but a special donation from an anonymous donor will make the effective cut 7.5 percent, to $99,196. There is a salary freeze in the second year; 3.3 percent and 2 percent increases in the third and fourth years; and restoration of the current base salary in the fifth year.

Other terms of the contract will transition the pension plan from defined-benefit to defined-contribution, and maintain the size of the orchestra at 99 performing musicians plus two librarians.

Three open positions in the string section will remain unfilled for the duration of the contract.

The union ratified the contract Wednesday afternoon. The union declined to reveal the vote total.

“I’m very pleased that both sides were able to work together to come to a resolution,” said Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto, who hosted meetings with the parties to work toward a settlement. “Unlike some labor disputes I’ve been involved with, there was never animosity between the parties. On behalf of the residents of Pittsburgh, I congratulate the musicians and board members for supporting each other to preserve this world-class institution.”

The contract represents a true compromise, according to symphony CEO Melia Tourangeau.

“We still have a huge uphill battle ahead of us to raise money over the next five years and beyond, but I do believe the settlement represents a huge sacrifice on the part of the musicians, and so I’m grateful,” she said.

The symphony’s strategy for fundraising will be to build the annual fund from $8.6 million to $13.5 to 14 million. Tourangeau said she believes there’s more capacity for growth for contributions in the $10,000 to $100,000 range than among the largest donors.

The symphony announced it has trimmed $800,000 from its administrative budget, including the elimination of 10 positions and a pay cut for the CEO.

Management’s initial contract proposal was for a 25 percent pay cut, changes to the pension and reduction in the orchestra’s size, necessitated, it said, because of $20.4 million in debt due in the next five years. The musicians contended the debt figure was inflated and that such a large pay cut would prevent attracting and retaining the top talent needed for a world-class orchestra.

Despite an attempt at federal mediation, the strike began Sept. 30 after management said a 15 percent pay cut was its final offer.

“As musicians, we are working very hard to ensure that the quality of the orchestra remains, but it will be challenging because our competitive edge clearly has been compromised, though not as much as was proposed and was the reason for the strike. We clearly have met in the middle,” said bass player Micah Howard, head of the musicians’ negotiating committee.

Hiring of musicians is handled by the musicians and the music director.

The contract follows the pattern of many contracts of Pittsburgh Symphony musicians accepting a large pay cut at the start of a contract followed by full restoration by its end.

“I do hope moving forward that these sacrifices will help Melia and Devin (McGranahan, board chairman) to obtain the support that is necessary to maintain our great orchestra and make it even better moving forward,” Howard said. “My hope is that this will be a starting point of many, many better years.”

Mark Kanny is the Tribune-Review classical music critic. Reach him at 412-320-7877 or

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.