ShareThis Page
Take the ‘D’ out of DUI: Drink at home |

Take the ‘D’ out of DUI: Drink at home

| Tuesday, November 20, 2007 12:00 a.m

A friend phoned last week asking about the possibility of writing an op-ed column for the Trib.

He was delayed while driving by a recent State Police DUI checkpoint, which caused him to miss a dinner reservation. When I reminded him that he would be arguing an unpopular, pro-drunken driving viewpoint, he quickly lost interest.

That’s understandable.

When the authorities can pull over 6,200 random motorists and snag 18 impaired drivers — plus two for drug violations, as they did during an Interstate 279 checkpoint Oct. 27 — it’s time we start separating our drinking from our driving.

Granted, that’s a hard division to make, since many suburban communities are places where driving is necessary in order to get just about anywhere.

But the same friend who considered writing an anti-checkpoint column has invited me to parties at his home in Pine. Given the distance from my house to his, and my fondness for hops, I’ve always declined.

He has few options. In many suburban communities, neighborhood bars are as rare as Saturday night carpools.

But that doesn’t prevent many folks from tanking up in bars and then taking the wheel.

Ali Wenger, a PennDOT spokeswoman in Harrisburg, said 21 Allegheny County residents lost their lives in DUI crashes last year. That’s a notable reduction from the 42 who died in 2005.

Still, there were 53,767 DUI cases in Pennsylvania last year, and 544 motorists lost their lives in drinking-related crashes.

With figures like those, I wonder why people don’t just drink at home.

I’ve been thinking about this a great deal lately, because I’ve grown increasingly tired of the noise, costs and unsolicited human contact of bar life.

There tend to be three basic people in bars: The desperate, the lonely and the desperately lonely.

Time and time again, I’ve dropped in some joint for a quiet beer or two, hoping for a little mental down time, only to hear rants about subjects as mundane and uninteresting as taxes, football, the state of “these crazy kids today,” the impending Martian invasion, the weather, who at the bar is sleeping with whom, golf scores and, my all-time favorite, the horrible ex-wife/husband who caused someone to, hic, sob, start drinking in the first place.

Although it has been said that drinking alone is a bad idea, I can’t recall being accosted with an unsolicited sob story in my living room. Nobody, to my knowledge, ever received a DUI citation, lost his or her license or caused deaths or bodily injuries in a motor vehicle crash in their dining room.

If we really want to see an end to DUI checkpoints, let’s park our cars and find a nice, comfy place to drink at home — a place where neither cops nor drunks can bother us.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.