ShareThis Page
Taliban, al-Qaida sympathizers many |

Taliban, al-Qaida sympathizers many

The Associated Press
| Saturday, March 9, 2002 12:00 a.m

MERA JAN, Afghanistan (AP) — From checkpoints that cling to the sides of mountains, U.S. special forces and their Afghan allies are trying to choke off supplies and reinforcements to al-Qaida fighters under siege in eastern Afghanistan.

As several American soldiers used binoculars to scan the rugged peaks in the distance Friday, they could see three mountain ranges, all potential hide-outs for al-Qaida and Taliban. Beyond those mountains are others linked by narrow gorges and steep valleys — all providing potential escape routes for al-Qaida fighters.

The checkpoints are near the town of Khost, a hotbed of Taliban sympathy near the Pakistani border. While the Americans refused to be interviewed, one soldier who wouldn’t give his name offered this warning: “If you are going to Khost, you should be careful. Without saying more, that’s why we’re here.”

The mission of the troops here is to cut off supplies and reinforcements to the hundreds of al-Qaida fighters hiding in mountain caves. They will also try to stop any al-Qaida and Taliban remnants from escaping to Pakistan and flush out sympathizers from among residents.

At one joint U.S.-Afghan checkpoint, about 20 miles north of Khost, U.S. special forces have set up a base on a ridge in a stone and mud building partially destroyed in the war against the Soviets in the 1980s. The roof is a deep green tarp — their only protection against the cold rain.

As the battle rages, Taliban and al-Qaida sympathizers are pressing a campaign in eastern and southern Afghanistan urging the faithful to wage jihad, or holy war, against the United States.

Earlier this week, a bomb blew apart a Khost shop selling video and music cassettes, both forbidden as evil under the Taliban.

“We blame al-Qaida and Taliban sympathizers for the attack on the airport and the bomb at the video cassette store,” the newly appointed governor of Khost, Mohammed Ibrahim, said yesterday.

On the northern edge of Khost, a shrine to al-Qaida and Taliban warriors killed in the war against terrorism attracts a steady stream of worshippers.

The 40 men buried there were killed when a bomb flattened a mosque in Khost in December. Two of the dead were from Pakistan.

At the shrine, hundreds of brightly colored scarves fluttered in the afternoon breeze, put there by the faithful seeking favors. Abdul Rahman brought his 3-year-old niece, Miska, to be healed. Wrapped in a dirty brown blanket, Miska could barely hold her head up.

Nearby a family brought a mentally handicapped relative. Another man could not see.

“They are all martyrs. We want only Muslims here. We don’t want non-Muslims,” said Abdullah Abid, who had come to pray. Nearby another man chimed in: “We want a pure Islamic government.”

Abdul Shakur, scratched his white beard and explained in a high-pitched voice: “Afghanistan is the home of Islam. This is what we want.”

A deeply conservative and tribal region, eastern Afghanistan was a stronghold of the Taliban and the site of several military training camps for Kashmiri militants, al-Qaida and Taliban.

After the 1998 bombings against U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, the United States targeted an al-Qaida camp with Tomahawk missiles to try to kill suspected terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden. About 20 people were killed, most of them Pakistani militants.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.