Archive

ShareThis Page
Tarentum council begins new year with an empty chair | TribLIVE.com
News

Tarentum council begins new year with an empty chair

Tribune-Review
| Tuesday, January 3, 2012 12:00 a.m
webTarentumBridge
Steven Adams | Tribune-Review
The George D. Stuart Bridge crosses the Allegheny River between Tarentum and New Kensington.

Borough council is beginning the new year with an empty chair.

The seven-member council is one member short after Mike Gutonski resigned Monday from his seat representing the 1st Ward.

Gutonski remains on council as an at-large member. He won both seats in the November election, defeating Tom Grates Jr. in the 1st Ward and Ray Kerr for the at-large position.

The borough is accepting letters of interest for the 1st Ward seat until noon Jan. 13. Any applicant must be a resident of the ward for at least one year and a registered voter.

The appointed member will serve for two years. Council could fill the seat at its next regular meeting at 6:30 p.m. Jan. 16.

Kerr, who attended council’s reorganization meeting last night, said he will apply for the 1st Ward seat. Kerr was appointed to the at-large seat in January 2010, replacing Carl Magnetta Jr., who resigned to become mayor.

Grates was appointed in January 2010 to represent the 1st Ward after Gutonski resigned.

District Judge Carolyn Bengel swore in Magnetta as mayor. She also delivered oaths of office to Gutonski, 2nd Ward Councilman Eric Carter, and 3rd Ward Councilman Tim Firko.

Tim Rapp was unanimously re-named council president, while Hugh Fox was re-named vice president.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.