ShareThis Page
‘Tax hike’ not in Pennsylvania lawmakers’ vocabulary |

‘Tax hike’ not in Pennsylvania lawmakers’ vocabulary

Marc Levy
| Monday, February 15, 2010 12:00 a.m

HARRISBURG — With another multibillion-dollar deficit thought to be around the bend for state government, many might think legislators would be looking at a tax increase.

But the only person talking openly about it is not running for re-election: Gov. Ed Rendell.

Voters will fill 228 of 253 seats in the Legislature in November’s general election, and most legislators would rather talk about creating jobs. Polls show jobs and the economy are widespread concerns among voters.

Pennsylvania’s rate of job losses has moderated, but the lack of hiring is troubling, and the state is recovering more slowly than the most fortunate states, said economist Ryan Sweet of Moody’s

“Given the troubles in the labor market, consumers being conservative in spending, all indications are that this will be another difficult year for state revenues,” Sweet said. “Even the next fiscal year, because employment will be slow to recover in Pennsylvania, you’d expect another difficult year for revenues.”

Republican leaders are talking about cutting state spending and trying to help the private sector create jobs. Democratic leaders are talking about using state programs, such as job training or low-interest loans, to help the jobless get employment and encourage employers to hire.

Rendell, the second-term Democrat who cannot by law run for a third term, says his concern is about the future.

Under the governor’s plan, none of the new money could be spent until after the end of the 2010-11 fiscal year covered by the budget he delivered last week to the Legislature. In it, he proposed pooling money from several new sources to help meet a projected $5.6 billion gap in 2011 and 2012 resulting from spiraling public pension costs and the expiration of federal stimulus budget aid.

The broadest of those sources is a plan to restructure the state sales tax, the state’s second-biggest money source. Rendell would lower the rate to 4 percent from 6 percent but would eliminate exemptions on transactions on 74 goods and services, including lawyers’ fees, electric bills and personal hygiene products.

Such a plan would add more than $850 million a year to the state’s treasury, while leaving exemptions on groceries, clothing and prescription drugs. Also, Rendell argues, it would bring fairness to a major tax riddled with exemptions that defy logic and attest to the influence of special interests.

Minutes after the governor rolled out the proposal, however, Senate President Joe Scarnati, R-Jefferson, called it “dead on arrival.” Democratic leaders did not endorse Rendell’s plan, saying it was just the beginning of the discussion.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.