Archive

ShareThis Page
Tax refunds worth $46M called questionable | TribLIVE.com
News

Tax refunds worth $46M called questionable

Tribune-Review
| Thursday, December 24, 2015 9:12 p.m

The Internal Revenue Service erroneously released more than $46 million in tax refunds in 2013 that had been flagged as potentially fraudulent, the result of poor monitoring and a computer programming error, the agency’s watchdog found.

The returns had been identified as questionable by two internal teams and should have been set aside for further review. But the IRS software system did the opposite, setting things in motion so refunds were released to taxpayers, an audit by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration disclosed this week.

The mistake allowed $27 million in refunds to be wrongly released to 13,043 taxpayers for tax year 2013. Auditors found another 3,910 “potentially fraudulent” returns for the same year that the IRS had marked for review, but which tax examiners had left unverified, costing the agency another $19 million.

The inspector general said the programming error alone could allow the IRS to issue $135 million in potentially erroneous refunds over five years.

The error overrode the agency’s two-week processing delay on potentially fraudulent tax return refunds, according to the report, removing the hold and allowing the suspicious refund to be disbursed before the IRS could complete its verification.

IRS officials apparently failed to catch the glitch because they were not aggressively monitoring timelines for reviewing tax returns.

Inspector General J. Russell George’s office began its audit after an IRS employee alerted the office that the agency was not examining cases to ensure that erroneous refunds were not being issued.

The watchdog recommended that the IRS fix the computer glitch and start periodic testing to make sure suspicious returns are verified in a timely way.

The agency agreed to all the recommendations. But officials did not commit to a date to put the programming fixes in place.

“The implementation of such programming changes are subject to budgetary constraints, limited resources, and competing priorities,” IRS officials told the inspector general, according to the audit. “Consequently, and due solely to those constraints, the IRS cannot provide an implementation date.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.