Teacher arrested after Homewood community meeting might settle with city |

Teacher arrested after Homewood community meeting might settle with city

James Knox
Dennis Henderson, a teacher at Manchester Academic Charter School..

A teacher has reached a proposed settlement with the city over his June 26, 2013, arrest outside a community meeting in Homewood, attorneys for the teacher and the arresting officer said Wednesday.

Dennis Henderson, 39, sued Pittsburgh police Officer Jonathan Gromek for unlawful retaliation, false arrest and imprisonment, excessive force and malicious prosecution.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Robert Mitchell ordered the case closed Wednesday based on reports of a settlement, according to court documents.

Vic Walczak, legal director for the state American Civil Liberties Union and one of Henderson’s lawyers, and Bryan Campbell, one of Gromek’s lawyers, confirmed there is a proposal, but it has to be approved by Pittsburgh city council.

Tim McNulty, spokesman for Mayor Bill Peduto, declined comment.

Henderson, who is black, said in the lawsuit that he left a meeting of the Community Empowerment Association and was standing outside his car getting a business card when Gromek sped past, swerving toward him, causing Henderson to exclaim, “Wow.”

Gromek turned his patrol cruiser around and confronted Henderson. He eventually arrested Henderson and charged him with disorderly conduct, resisting arrest and blocking a public sidewalk passage.

Henderson, a teacher at Manchester Academic Charter School, spent about 12 hours in jail. Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. withdrew the charges a month later. Campbell said Gromek remains a Pittsburgh police officer.

Brian Bowling is a Trib Total Media staff writer. He can be reached at 412-325-4301 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.