ShareThis Page
Teacher salaries draining county tapayers |

Teacher salaries draining county tapayers

| Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:00 a.m

Some of my cyberspace pen pals are just as upset about the Allegheny County real estate assessment mess as I am.

I suggested moving to adjoining counties for some tax relief, thereby buying time to attack the core problem, which is runaway school boards that tax and spend without voters’ approval.

Unfortunately, some readers of my swill don’t think I have a clue (which seems to be an occupational hazard for me these days).

S.C. sent the following e-mail message. Space limitations required some editing. Her comments are in quotes. My comments are italicized within the text of her missive.

“I think you need actual facts instead of reactionary blather when it comes to your assumption that a taxpayer should escape to the counties surrounding Allegheny County in order to avoid paying for ‘very expensive school districts.’ I’ll get back to you comparing average school district millage in Allegheny County with the millage of school districts.”

I’ll save you the time. Ask any Realtor to show you listings for comparable homes in the metro area. Read the tax figures on each listing sheet.

“I can give you one probable answer right now: teachers’ salaries — not the starting salary for a brand new teacher that causes the problem, but the salary teachers earn after 20 years on the job. Teachers near the end of their careers make about $75,000 a nine-month year. That is largely the result of decades of attractive union contracts.”

Who do you think is responsible for agreeing to those contracts• (Hint: Nine people who face the audience at school board meetings.)

“Employee salaries and benefits make up nearly 75 percent of the typical school district budget. These numbers cannot simply be cut in some budget-slashing whim.”

Cutting costs is not a whim-thing. Businesses do it every day. And the well-run ones don’t sign sweetheart long-term deals that tie up taxpayers for more than half a decade.

“Health insurance benefit costs are soaring for school districts just as they are for other employers, while those salaries adjust upward (according to contract) 3 percent or 4 percent a year. School districts need 5 percent (increase) in order to meet their payroll and keep up with the cost of living.”

Should the standard of living go down for taxpayers so it doesn’t have to go down for these government employees•

“And before you complain too much about teacher salaries, keep in mind that teachers were worth more than the very low pay they once received. It was collectively determined that ‘you get what you pay for,’ and teachers needed to be paid more and appreciated more in order to improve the education of our nation’s children.”

Surely you’re joking. If taxpayers actually got what they paid for, Pennsylvania would have the best scoring students in America.

“This was an opinion held by both Republicans and Democrats. As with most everything in education, it has become clear that money isn’t the whole answer… but that is another e-mail.”

I can’t wait.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.