ShareThis Page
Teada keeps traditions alive |

Teada keeps traditions alive

Bob Karlovits
| Thursday, September 8, 2005 12:00 a.m

The music of Teada is helping span generations and centuries, says the band’s fiddler, Oisin Mac Diarmada.

“What we’re trying to do is help keep the great Irish musical tradition alive across the world,” he says.

Teada will make its first visit to the Pittsburgh Irish Festival as probably the event’s most-traditional band, playing some songs that are 150 years old as well as new ones that sound that way, Mac Diarmada says.

He says he used to be fearful that more rock-oriented Irish bands would hurt traditional music by stamping out interest in it.

But he has discovered there is an audience that prefers the older material as well as one for the newer.

“You just have to give each artist the freedom to do what he wants,” he says in a phone interview from Dublin. “Rather than worry, we just focus on what we’re doing.”

The band is only four years old, but band members approach music with a sense that is much older. Mac Diarmada says that is simply a product of his interest and that of Paul Finn, on button accordion, Damien Stenson on flutes and whistle, Sean McElwain on bouzouki and guitar, and Tristan Rosenstock on bodhran.

They got together to do some work on a television program, Mac Diarmada says, and found it comfortable to keep performing.

The likely instrument that has been left out is the Uilleann pipes, which Mac Diarmada feels comfortable omitting. He says the pipes would give a band a classic sound, but also limits keys in which tunes can be played.

That doesn’t limit their look at the music, though. The band, for instance, is able to perform a classic tune, “The Ace and the Deuce of Piping,” convincingly without the instrument.

“We just walk into it a different way,” he says.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.