ShareThis Page
Teen killed, five hurt in 4 shootings in city |

Teen killed, five hurt in 4 shootings in city

The Tribune-Review
| Thursday, May 11, 2006 12:00 p.m

A teenager was killed and five other people were wounded Wednesday in four unrelated shootings throughout Pittsburgh.

Ronald Vesci, 18, of Homewood, was fatally wounded and a 2-year-old girl was grazed by a bullet at 1:15 p.m. during a drive-by shooting outside a house in the 7300 block of Monticello Street in Homewood, said Major Crimes Cmdr. Tom Stangrecki. Someone outside the house returned fire.

Vesci was drying a car parked outside the home and the girl was playing in the front yard with other family members when a sport utility vehicle pulled up, and the driver and passenger opened fire, Stangrecki said. The man who returned fire is licensed to carry a gun, Stangrecki said.

Two people were wounded shortly after 7 p.m. near the 900 block of Cherokee Street in the Hill District.

A man walked into Mercy Hospital, Uptown, a short time later with a gunshot wound to the head and another was taken by friends to UPMC Shadyside hospital with a gunshot wound to the back. The wounds are not believed to be life-threatening.

City police began chasing a car believed to have been involved in the shooting at 7:19 p.m. Two passengers bailed out during the chase, which ended near the intersection of Wylie and Herron avenues when the car hit a pole. The driver ran into the woods and was captured a short time later.

On the North Side, a 23-year-old man was shot in the thigh and ankle about 11:45 a.m. on Reddour Street. Police later arrested the driver of a car believed to be involved in that shooting. Officers did not identify the victim or the driver.

Tabitha Harrison, 27, of Knoxville, was critically injured after police say her ex-boyfriend, Charles Cutrary, 21, broke into her home and shot her in the back.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.