ShareThis Page
Temple gridder transfers to Cal U |

Temple gridder transfers to Cal U

Rick Bruni Jr.
| Thursday, May 8, 2003 12:00 a.m

CALIFORNIA – Suddenly, Temple has become a pipeline of sorts for the California University football program.

Dan Bosnic, one of the Owls’ starting tight ends in 2002, transferred Wednesday to Cal U. The former standout at Laurel Highlands follows quarterback Greg Dapper, who transferred back in mid-January. Bosnic will be junior-eligible.

“We got ourselves a great kid, a good athlete and a solid blocker,” Cal U coach John Luckhardt said. “Temple changed offenses, making the tight end far less prominent; there were a lot of dynamics involved like moving closer to home.”

The Vulcans are also reaping the benefits of Temple’s expected oust from the Big East.

“Twenty-five of their 30 recruits this year are junior college transfers,” Luckhardt said. “They want to win the next two years and get out of there and a lot of the players (already on the roster) they got a bad deal.”

Bosnic was originally recruited as a quarterback after leading the WPIAL in passing as a senior with over 1,700 yards. Also a standout in basketball for the Mustangs, Bosnic recorded a 34′-5″ vertical leap last spring and was named to the Big East All-Academic Team.

After sustaining a hand injury and missing the 2000 season, Bosnic began practicing with the Owls in spring of 2001 when he switched to his current position. He caught one pass for 23 yards this past season.

With Robin Brown set to graduate, the 6-foot-7, 258-pound Bosnic should fit in nicely with Vulcans’ senior tight end Matt Rado.

“Matt has had a tremendous spring; at this stage, we’re now strong at tight end and solid at quarterback, tailback and wide receiver,” Luckhardt said. “This sets the tone if we want to compete with the Slippery Rocks and IUPs of the world.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.