ShareThis Page
Templeton soldier credited with quick action in Iraq |

Templeton soldier credited with quick action in Iraq

| Friday, April 15, 2005 12:00 a.m

A Templeton combat medic is credited for his quick, life-saving action for members of a local guard unit.

Five members of the Ford City National Guard Co. A, 1/112th Infantry, including a New Bethlehem soldier, were injured March 29 when an improvised explosive device detonated near Tikrit, Iraq.

Medics SSG Shawn Hamil of Templeton and SSG James Zaremba of New Kensington provided initial aid to the wounded soldiers and lessened the severity of wounds for most of the soldiers according to Capt. Corey Angell, Pennsylvania National Guard Information Officer at Fort Indiantown Gap, who released the information yesterday.

Hamil is a certified paramedic and is the immediate response captain for Pine Township Volunteer Fire Department.

According to Angell, seven soldiers were investigating an explosion involving a convoy of vehicles and mechanized armor when a second device exploded injuring five soldiers.

Among the injured were Spc. Charles J. Ammerman of New Bethlehem, who received bruises to his face and left ear. After treatment in Tikrit, he was returned to duty.

Spc. Paul Statzer of Zelinople suffered the most serious injuries and was immediately flown to the intensive care unit at Walter Reed Army Hospital near Washington.

Sgt Chad M. Barnhardt of Butler suffered a ruptured ear drum and SFC Joseph B. Ackerson of Marion Center sustained shrapnel wounds to his head, face, back and right arm. Both were treated at an Army medical facility in Tikrit.

Also treated in Iraq was Sgt. Stephen J. Ceriani of Beaver Falls. The blast ruptured Ceriani’s right ear drum and he sustained shrapnel wounds to his right arm.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.