ShareThis Page
Terror trial defendant’s character disputed |

Terror trial defendant’s character disputed

The Associated Press
| Thursday, January 22, 2015 7:51 p.m

NEW YORK — A prosecutor at a terrorism trial said Thursday that a Saudi Arabian defendant was a top al-Qaida terrorist who sought to spread Osama bin Laden’s call to kill Americans. Meanwhile, a defense lawyer described him as a dissident waging a peaceful campaign against corruption in his native country.

Khaled al-Fawwaz “worked for years, directly and personally, for Osama bin Laden. … The defendant helped Osama bin Laden declare his bloody war on Americans,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Nicholas Lewin told the anonymous jurors in opening statements at the trial in federal court in Manhattan.

Defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim countered by telling jurors, “There is no hate in the heart of Khaled al-Fawwaz. There is hope his beloved country of Saudi Arabia will be reformed.”

Al-Fawwaz, 52, has pleaded not guilty in the conspiracy resulting in twin embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania on Aug. 7, 1998, that killed 224 people, including a dozen Americans.

U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan told jurors just before the start of openings that their names won’t be available publicly and that no one connected to the trial knows them. Anonymous juries are common at terrorism trials.

Al-Fawwaz’s trial has contributed to heightened security at the courthouse, with armed federal guards standing watch.

The defendant was extradited from Great Britain in 2012. He had been scheduled to stand trial with Abu Anas al-Libi — who was snatched off the streets of Libya in 2013 — but al-Libi died this month after a long illness.

In opening statements, Lewin accused al-Fawwaz of leading one of al-Qaida’s early training camps and helping lead a cell of terrorists in Africa. He said al-Fawwaz made sure bin Laden’s 1996 declaration of war against the United States reached the world by communicating with the media and helping translate bin Laden’s words for multiple audiences.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.