ShareThis Page
The Birdie likes Plum’s character |

The Birdie likes Plum’s character

The Birdie has hidden his identity for decades, dating all the way back to the 1930s when he was depicted as Woody Woodpecker in this very newspaper.

Recently, the A-K Valley’s high school football legend heard that Plum was out to unmask him and reveal his true character.

“Not going to happen,” the Birdie said, sliding his Clark Kent glasses up his beak. “That would tarnish a tradition. The good Plum teams of the past never found me out and this one won’t either. I have, however, discovered these Plum Mustangs are not who we thought they were.”

And we let them off the hook …

(Ghost writer inserts Dennis Green reference, gets it past copy desk).

The Birdie picked Plum to finish 2-7 and miles away from the playoffs. But the Mustangs made him look silly — what else is new? — and pulled a major upset in the first round, beating Penn Hills, 17-6. The win set off alarm bells in the Birdie’s office (broom closet).

“I had to make sure my Twitter machine wasn’t broken,” the Birdie said, having a Coke and a smile. “Thought it was spitting out bad scores.”

He claims he almost picked the upset but had too much faith in Penn Hills and its A-K Valley West coaching staff.

“I paced the VND hallways for days pondering that one,” Birdie said. “I even slipped on our newly-waxed floors in the process. I couldn’t bring myself to pick the upset; thought Penn Hills’ offense, which Springdale used in the late 2000s, would be unstoppable. They said it wouldn’t work in Quad-A.”

While Apollo-Ridge’s lightning-strike offense has been a thrilling, and Highlands’ run, despite a rash of injuries, has interested the Birdie, Plum has captivated him.

Plum has earned the respect of the Birdie unlike few others, but … he did his homework, and doesn’t think the Mustangs can make it two stunners in a row.

“This team has defied the odds all season,” he said. “But when November comes, you know snow is soon to follow. Some things are inevitable. Plum’s run has been incredible, and their defense has shined, but beating Penn Hills and McKeesport back-to-back, in the playoffs, is too much to ask. It would take a real superhero to pull that one off. Are there even any phone booths left in Plum?

“Feel free to prove me wrong again, though, Plum. Isn’t that what I’m here for, no matter who I am?”

While he finds the game sites to be a bit suspect, the Birdie is ready for Friday.

“Highlands/Seton-La Salle at Valley? Yeah, that’s halfway between the two schools, right, WPIAL ( tee-hee)?” he said. “Not that I’m complaining. Less gas for the Chevette.

“Apollo-Ridge/Washington at Latrobe? Another odd one. How they pick these sites is beyond me. I mean, there’s no Greensburg Pike in Greensburg, either, so there’s that.”

Now, his predictions:

Plum (6-4) vs. McKeesport (9-1) at Norwin

If Plum can produce points, the defense and special teams can do the heavy lifting. But McKeesport’s speed will wear down the Mustangs in the end. Plum will run out of gas.

McKeesport, 21-17

Apollo-Ridge (9-1) vs. Washington (10-0) at Latrobe

Apollo-Ridge: the most entertainment value you can get in the Valley for 7 bucks ($5 for students, presale). The frenetic Vikings will out-touchdown another opponent and make the Class AA final four. On your blocks.

Apollo-Ridge, 36-28

Highlands (10-0) vs. Seton-La Salle (9-1) at Valley

Injuries have put a deflating dent in a promising season for the Golden Rams, and the voids they have caused will show, particularly when it comes to pass defense. The Rebels can zing it, and they’ll do something nobody else has done: solve the Rams.

Seton-La Salle, 28-24

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.