ShareThis Page
The creative destruction of capitalism |

The creative destruction of capitalism

Bill Steigerwald
| Sunday, March 28, 2004 12:00 a.m

To create, capitalism must also destroy.

You don’t have to spend hours comparing this year’s Fortune magazine list of top 500 U.S. companies with the list from 50 years ago to understand that cruel truth.

The fact that capitalism has to destroy old things in order to create new wealth and higher standards of living for the masses should be obvious to every breathing, thinking adult over 30. It isn’t.

Many people – mainly the economic illiterates of mainstream journalism and the economic medicine men of politics who call for things like the outlawing of outsourcing – constantly decry or try to thwart the paradoxical process that economist Joseph Schumpeter long ago dubbed “the creative destruction of capitalism.”

Schumpeter used the term to describe the heartless but ultimately beneficial waves of competition, innovation and entrepreneurial ferment that create and destroy and re-create our economic and social world.

Capitalism’s creative hurricane is unstoppable. In 250 years, it has transformed us from a nation of sweating dirt farmers to a wealthy post-industrial service economy run by callous-free knowledge workers.

The evidence of the damage capitalism does to society is found in history books and on our main streets. Whole industries were destroyed.

Canals were made obsolete by railroads. Railroads were nearly wiped out by trucks and cars. Computers murdered the typewriter industry. Digital cameras are destroying Eastman Kodak’s 100-year hegemony.

Capitalism’s mighty wind blows away corner drug stores and topples corporate giants with equal ease. Look at Fortune’s list of 10 largest corporations from 1954. General Motors, Ford and General Electric were there, as they are today. So was Esso (now Exxon-Mobil).

But so was mighty Gulf Oil, since 1984 a forgotten meal of No. 6 ChevronTexaco. So was U.S. Steel, now 209th on Fortune’s list. Swift meats, today part of No. 85 ConAgra, was No. 5 in 1954. Wal-Mart, today’s No. 1, did not exist.

Remember the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company• Government trust-busters once worried it would monopolize America’s grocery sector. Today A&P is virtually extinct, thanks to leaner, smarter chains like Safeway and Giant Eagle – which face the cutthroat predations of Wal-Mart and Costco.

Around here, former icons of local commerce like Isaly’s, the Joseph Horne Co. and Hechinger’s have disappeared. But now we buy what we need at Bruster’s, Kohl’s and Lowe’s, often in greater variety for less. And when poor US Airways joins Pan Am in inefficient-airline heaven, we’ll be flying JetBlue or AirTran.

The creative destruction of capitalism is not a pretty or tender process, as Pittsburgh’s lost armies of manufacturing workers know too well. But the ever-grinding “churn” of capitalism, which simultaneously destroys and creates millions of jobs each year, ultimately produces more winners than losers in the long run.

It’s a shame when the short-term price of progress is paid in lost jobs or fortunes by people you know and love. But capitalism – even the increasingly impure and over-regulated form we practice — has made hundreds of millions of Americans rich, healthy and spoiled.

Its dual creative-destructive nature shouldn’t surprise anyone anymore. Unless you work in protected government places like the U.S. Postal Service, a state liquor store or the Port Authority, it’s the way capitalism works and always has.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.