The DeLay conviction won’t stand |

The DeLay conviction won’t stand

To gain a better idea of how credible is the conviction of Tom DeLay, look to the sentencing phase. For that will indicate just how “appealable” the case is. And from the bill of particulars, the odds for vindication on appeal appear to be high.

Mr. DeLay, 63, the one-time powerful Republican House majority leader, was convicted on Wednesday of one count each of money laundering and conspiracy to commit money laundering. Those were the fallback charges when the Democrat prosecution determined it couldn’t win a campaign-finance violations case.

DeLay and two associates were accused of funnelling $190,000 in corporate donations to state candidates in Texas in 2002 through the Republican National Committee. There was no direct evidence that any laws were broken. And it only bolsters DeLay’s contention that he was targeted for an ensuing GOP victory that allowed Republicans to control the redistricting process.

And while many in the media were quick to trumpet that DeLay could face life in prison, it’s important to note that he could be sentenced to a punishment as little as probation. And if probation is the sentence, it will be the best indicator that this case was political, it likely can be overturned on appeal and the prosecution’s employment of a “novel legal theory” wasn’t novel at all but prosecutory misconduct.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.