ShareThis Page
The firefighters’ crunch: Time for action |

The firefighters’ crunch: Time for action

| Thursday, July 14, 2005 12:00 a.m

The number of volunteer firefighters in Pennsylvania has plummeted from 300,000 in 1976 to 72,000 today.

The consequences are concrete. Fire companies often are getting to the scene later than they should and with too few firefighters. Infrequently, they don’t get there at all.

Pennsylvania has the most volunteer fire companies in the nation. Allegheny and Westmoreland counties are No. 1 and No. 2 in the state, with 196 and 126 companies, respectively.

This growing crisis has been a long time in coming. The economic and social milieu in which the volunteer firefighting system emerged is disappearing.

Is there a solution to be had before a crisis becomes catastrophic• Shall we have mergers and small groups of paid firefighters (especially during the daytime) who work with volunteers• Shall departments provide room and board to unmarrieds who volunteer and/or provide health insurance and pension plans• Would tax breaks and tuition credits attract interest?

Such incentives may require public money — taxes — as so many fire companies barely get by now on donations and small government grants.

Basic public safety is first a local concern. But lack of leadership on the local level invites state intervention, God forbid.

Community is a concept in extremis. It need not remain so.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.