ShareThis Page
The key matchup: ‘Cadillac’ vs. Steelers run ‘D’ |

The key matchup: ‘Cadillac’ vs. Steelers run ‘D’

| Sunday, December 3, 2006 12:00 a.m

Tampa Bay RB “Cadillac” Williams vs. the Steelers’ run defense

“Cadillac” Williams

The Buccaneers’ first pick in 2005 wasted little time in leaving his mark in the NFL by rushing for 434 yards in his first three games, the highest such total in league history. Williams wound up with 1,178 yards and a 4.1 average on 290 carries, as the Bucs turned around a 5-11 record and returned to the playoffs at 11-5. His average has dipped to 3.8 yards this season (183 attempts for 697 yards), and the Bucs are struggling again (3-8), but they remain undefeated when Williams rushes 21 or more times (9-0 overall, 2-0 this season). With rookie quarterback Bruce Gradkowski still feeling his way, Williams is the established commodity on the Tampa Bay offense.

The Steelers’ run defense

The Steelers still haven’t allowed a 100-yard rusher since Edgerrin James of Indianapolis picked up 124 yards on the ground against them Nov. 28, 2005, but last week in Baltimore, the Steelers’ run defense sprang a few leaks. Ravens running back Jamal Lewis gouged them for 61 yards on 13 first-half attempts (4.7 a pop), as Baltimore built a 17-0 lead. The Steelers gave up an uncharacteristic 94 yards on the ground overall in the first two quarters, more than they had surrendered in four of their first 10 games, before the Ravens eased up and yanked Lewis from the game in the second half.

The matchup

Williams, like most backs, heats up as he becomes more involved in a game. Over his brief career, he’s averaged 3.0 yards per carry in the first quarter, 3.6 in the second, 4.3 in the third and 5.3 in the fourth. The Steelers’ challenge will be to prevent Williams from getting cranked up early and getting himself in a position to inflict damage late. The best way to make Gradkowski uncomfortable and take advantage of his inexperience is to deny him a running game upon which to rely. And the best way to do that is to keep Cadillac contained. That’ll be tougher than usual for the Steelers without strong safety Troy Polamalu (knee). EDGE: STEELERS

Last week

Ravens return man B.J. Sams didn’t dominate the Steelers bringing back punts and kickoffs in last Sunday’s 27-0 debacle. Sams managed just six yards on punt returns, in part because the Ravens were flagged three times in such situations and in part because of some short punts. Sams also had just one shot at a kickoff return (30 yards), so at least the special teams were able to exit M&T Bank Stadium with their dignity somewhat intact. EDGE: STEELERS

– By Mike Prisuta

is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.