The morning after the election |

The morning after the election

Come Wednesday morning it will all be over. Suddenly, there will be no more rallies, there will be no more failed attempts to be in three places at once and fried fish, kolbassi and hot sausage sandwiches no longer will be the only dinner options.

Those who lost will be slow to rise, taking a few moments to decide if it was just a dream or if the voters could possibly have been that wrong. The draw to stay in bed will be strong and they should linger. No one will be beating a path to the losers’ doors.

In time, they will find comfort in the words of the Greek philosopher Thucydides — “In a democracy, someone who fails to get elected to office can always console himself with the thought that there was something not quite fair about it.”

The rush of humanity will be a problem for the winners. Everybody wants to be seen with winners, some to heap praise, most to highlight their own vital contributions to victory. Winners quickly will discover they have become great golfers and their jokes are instantly funnier.

Win or lose, there will be a letdown from the hectic days of the campaign.

It is said that one old-time Philadelphia politician had the “black dog” at his side for weeks, even after a winning election, and had to be watched. Few candidates have the blasé attitude of former Philippines first lady Imelda Marcos, who said, “Win or lose, we go shopping after the elections.”

If Democrat Tom Wolf wins, as all the polls predict, the “morning after” pundits will point to that first television ad that introduced him to the voters. Homespun, talking as a family man to Pennsylvania families, Wolf drove his old Jeep all the way to victory, they will say.

If Republican Gov. Tom Corbett wins, he will be heralded as the “comeback kid.” That photo of President Truman brandishing the Chicago Tribune banner headline that wrongfully declared “Dewey Defeats Truman” again will make the rounds.

Both candidates, win or lose, will talk about turnout and how “get out the vote” efforts succeeded or failed. Much will depend on the “T,” the usually Republican-performing middle of the state; solid Wolf returns there will be seen as confirmation that the York County resident was embraced as the hometown candidate.

Across Pennsylvania, one-half of the candidates in every contested race will feel the sword of public rebuke. Those with young families will wonder how to break the bad news before the kids head off to school. The other half, the winners, will have awakened the kids with the good news as soon as they got home from their victory parties.

In a few days, the campaigns will be forgotten by nearly everyone. For the candidates, however, that Wednesday morning feeling will linger for years.

As Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., said, “Winning may not be everything, but losing has little to recommend it.”

Joseph Sabino Mistick, a lawyer, law professor and political analyst, lives in Squirrel Hill (

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.