ShareThis Page
The nightmare ends as Tom Balya exits |

The nightmare ends as Tom Balya exits

| Thursday, December 29, 2011 12:00 a.m

Rather than exit with any class, departing Westmoreland County Commissioner Tom Balya, in his final budget fight, firmly planted his thumb to his nose and furiously waggled his fingers in a farewell salute to the public he supposedly served.

Mr. Balya and fellow Democrat Commissioner Ted Kopas (the latter now relegated to minority party status) slapped together a 2012 lame-duck budget that, in willy-nilly fashion, slashed spending by 15 percent.

After all, Balya insisted, that’s what Charles Anderson and Tyler Courtney, the new Republican majority — the first in more than half-a-century and sworn into office on Tuesday — campaigned for.

What hypocrisy. The same Democrat duo a year ago threatened a government shutdown when Mr. Anderson didn’t buckle to the Democrats’ thuggish demands.

And, to be clear, what Anderson and Mr. Courtney championed was an end to Democrats’ deficit spending plans with multimillion-dollar shortfalls — “budgeting” that in the private sector would get any chief financial officer booted.

So, what consideration to Westmoreland County residents went into this new, slapdash fiscal blueprint• It threatens regular sessions of the county’s courts but advances some pet projects, says Anderson, who voted against it. Oh, and there’s a raise for unionized county employees.

That’s “responsible” budgeting, Tom Balya-style. Thank goodness that Westmoreland County’s long nightmare finally is over.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.