ShareThis Page
The Pay-Jackers: Legislative larcenists |

The Pay-Jackers: Legislative larcenists

| Wednesday, November 2, 2005 12:00 a.m

The so-called four-day rule, a little-known Internal Revenue Service tax deduction for state and federal lawmakers, gives new meaning to “tax cuts for the rich.”

The IRS allows those representatives living more than 50 miles from their workplaces — their respective state or federal capitals — a $141 tax deduction for each day they are in legislative session, attending a committee meeting or when they are home, as long as no more than four days pass between the legislative business days, according to The Patriot News of Harrisburg.

If a salesman made the $81,050 base salary that Pennsylvania legislators granted themselves in July without debate or public input, he would have to pay almost $2,400 more in taxes than the commonwealth’s so-called public servants.

That probably explains the bipartisan indifference in the General Assembly to lower taxes for other Pennsylvanians.

And why there are so many nonvoting session days for legislators.

And why Democrats inside the Beltway complaining about so-called tax cuts for the rich never propose eliminating the four-day rule.

To compound this outrage, politicians claiming the $141-per-diem nontaxable deduction are not required to keep receipts.

No paper trail.

No accountability.

Sweet — for the legislative larcenists, that is.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.