ShareThis Page
The price of fraud |

The price of fraud

| Saturday, December 27, 2008 12:00 a.m

One of the largest cases of health-care fraud ever in the Pittsburgh region finally ended last week.

Douglas Henderson of Lower Burrell was sentenced in federal court to four years in prison and ordered to repay $12 million to Highmark Blue Cross/Blue Shield.

Henderson, 47, a chiropractor, devised an elaborate scheme to defraud the health insurer and lived high on the hog until it unraveled.

He persuaded a number of people to submit fraudulent claims for services at the former Burrell Chiropractic Clinic in Lower Burrell from 1995 to 2002. Those people received kickbacks when the insurance claims were paid.

And those people have paid dearly, as well. About 15 have been sentenced to jail or ordered to repay the money in recent years.

Kudos to the investigators, who worked many years to unravel the deception.

And shame on all those from this area who were part of this cynical scheme. They thought they could rip off “the system” and make a fast buck. And who would get hurt?

Just all of us ordinary people, forced to pay higher costs for health insurance because of this kind of fraud.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.