The real immigration problem |

The real immigration problem

You’ll never catch me talking tough or mean about immigrants, legal or illegal.

I’ve always liked people who are brave enough, smart enough and ambitious enough to leave their nasty native lands or backward cultures and come to America, where they too often are not welcomed or appreciated by the folks who got here first.

My tolerance for immigrants probably is genetic. My mother was an immigrant. She came from Canada in the late 1930s to go to Pitt. And my dad’s mother, Anna Frisco, got off the boat in New York Harbor from Sicily on Nov. 3, 1909. She traveled alone and carried $30 — $600 in today’s money. She was 10.

My Mom’s Canadian culture and Irish heritage posed no threat to America’s way of life. But my grandmother was part of the unwashed horde of Eastern and Southern European migrants that crowded our cities to overflowing and freaked out the WASPs who ran the country but ultimately transformed us into a rich nation of pizza and pierogi eaters.

Today, thanks to years of failed government immigration policies, scary new waves of immigrants swarm into the states from Mexico and Central America, legally and illegally. Open-border advocates and businessmen say these millions do what immigrants have always done — provide young, hard-working, low-cost, raw human talent for a dynamic economy that always needs it.

Anti-immigration forces argue immigrants cost taxpayers billions in social services. Unions say immigrants — who have a bad habit of working harder for less pay than natives — steal their members’ jobs.

And hysterics like Pat Buchanan warn that Hispanic immigrants are here not to assimilate, but to reconquer our Southwest and supplant our hallowed red-white-and-blue culture with their alien brown one.

But immigrants aren’t the real problem. They don’t cause unemployment, deficits or terrorism. As always, virtually all come here to work and better themselves, not to do nasty things or become welfare recipients.

It’s not immigrants’ fault that our government and politicians can’t or won’t run an orderly, efficient, non-bureaucratic, unpoliticized immigration system. It’s not their fault our social welfare industry sucks too many immigrants into the dead-end world of entitlements and dependency. It’s ours.

We don’t need protection against foreign human imports any more than we need protection against foreign steel or Japanese cars. America — especially cities like Pittsburgh that grew great because of immigrant brains and brawn and are dying because they can’t attract them any more — needs all the hardworking bodies it can get.

Instead of building reverse Berlin Walls on our borders, we should be figuring out how to give Hispanic immigrants temporary work permits so they can freely criss-cross our borders, the way rock stars and Euro-bankers can.

Help nonresident immigrants open bank accounts and encourage them to live here legally and permanently. But don’t give them welfare benefits upon arrival or segregate their kids in schools by language or ethnicity.

Unions will still whine about lost jobs. Buchanans will still wail about our culture (which is taking over the world) being undermined, not enhanced. Tough. History shows immigrants are priceless national resources, not liabilities. Immigrants are what make New York City and L.A. perpetual boomtowns. Immigrants are what made America great — and a lot less boring.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.