ShareThis Page
The taping scandal: Ban Belichick |

The taping scandal: Ban Belichick

| Sunday, May 11, 2008 12:00 a.m

To take license with a famous Harold Laski quote, when the rules of the game prove unsuitable for victory, the gentleman of New England changes the rules of the game.

By any reasonable standard of sportsmanship, New England Patriots Head Coach Bill Belichick should lose his situation.

Mr. Belichick was fined $500,000 last year by the NFL when the franchise was caught taping coaches’ signals during a game with the New York Jets. The team was fined another $250,000 and forfeited a first-round draft pick.

Now comes word, from The New York Times, that, as many suspected, this was no isolated incident. The employee responsible for the taping has turned over to the league eight tapes, including rather sophisticated two-angle shots from the Pats’ 2002 AFC Championship Game with the Pittsburgh Steelers.

All of this only reaffirms how the signal-stealing taping was no lark but an expansive and well-organized cheating operation.

The NFL could choose to levy additional fines and penalties against Mr. Belichick and the Patriots. It could even suspend Belichick. But those punishments are too lenient.

Sadly, “cheating” and “sport” have become synonymous. And if the Patriots have any integrity, they’ll fire Belichick. And if the NFL has any guts, it will ban Bill Belichick from the league.

Anything less renders sportsmanship meaningless.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.