The Thursday wrap |

The Thursday wrap

START stopped: The Obama administration had been pulling out all the stops in its public relations campaign to get the lame-duck Senate to ratify the new arms-limitation treaty with the Russians. But then Sen. John Kyl of Arizona, the Senate’s No. 2 Republican, whom Democrats hoped to woo, said “Nyet.” He cited the lack of time to properly debate the proposed treaty before year’s end. Actually, New START is a lousy agreement that favors Moscow and directly threatens the security of the United States. Period.

Earth to pols: Democrats were so severely slapped around in the Nov. 2 elections, it’s hard to imagine that they still don’t get it. But they don’t, as evidenced by their continuing refusal to consider extending the Bush-era tax cuts for “the rich.” Worse, some Republicans are advocating a temporary extension — two or three years. Like there’s the salve of certainty for businesses trying to plan for the future, right• Congress is sure to screw this up and everybody’s taxes will rise on Jan. 1. And what a march on Washington that will be.

Ed’s debt: Lame-duck Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell loves to brag about his fiscal stewardship. Never mind that the commonwealth’s debt rose from $6.1 billion to $9.2 billion during Fast Eddie’s tenure. No send-off party will be complete for this fella without a big bucket of warm tar and big bag of itchy feathers.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.