The true Toney legacy |

The true Toney legacy

I am writing on behalf of the children of former Harmar Police Chief Rick Toney.

We’re asking people to read between the lines of a complex story behind a simple headline, “Ex-chief sidesteps prison with guilty plea,” (Sept. 26). In 2009, my mother, Kim, and running mate Jerry Chalmers ran for township supervisor. They won, but their opponents challenged the votes. The Allegheny County Elections Department found the challenge to be unsubstantial and the case was dropped.

But a complaint was made to the U.S. Justice Department and a state case went to federal court.

So read between the lines of this political battle to understand why my father chose to plead guilty when he so badly wanted to fight it to clear his name. Please go to This research on the federal courts shows how many non-guilty plea cases end in imprisonment and defendants are judged more harshly when a plea bargain is not taken.

My father could have lost his pension — our family’s only source of income — and he could have gone to prison, But worst, we could have lost him.

My entire family stood behind him during this court hearing. The article on his plea skipped the details, like the hesitation and pain in his voice and the sobs from his family.

His legacy will not be this case, but rather the love and devotion in the eyes and hearts of his family and friends who know the real Rick Toney. We are his legacy and our family shall strive on like the fighters we are.

Chelsea Schrock


The writer is Rick Toney’s daughter.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.